Twisters (2024)

Tonight’s movie is TWISTERS, considered a stand-alone film and a follow-up, but not necessarily a sequel to the 1996 film with a similar name and which starred a passel of actors, many with recognizable faces who drew us into the world of storm chasing, particularly one kind of storm: tornados.

I can confirm that the 1996 film, TWISTER, and 2024’s TWISTERS are, for the most part, stand-alone films. While the current film casts allusions to the earlier film, they are two very different films in structure and story.

Unlike the original, the current film doesn’t give a timeframe aside from “FIVE YEARS LATER”, where most of the action of this film takes place after an opening set piece.

From my perspective, five years ago, we’re introduced to a group of Muskogee State College students who are trying to verify a theory by Kate Carter that using a certain chemical compound, the power of a tornado can be dissipated. Kate is working with four other students, including her boyfriend Jeb, and another close friend, Javi.

Kate and her team are pulling a trailer full of barrels of her chemical and a Dorothy V [five] device filled with the same sensors we saw Jo and her team use in 1996. Kate’s team locates an F1 tornado and places the barrels in the tornado’s path while Javi lingers back to launch the sensors and monitor the chemical’s reaction.  At first, it appears that the chemical works, but then suddenly, disaster strikes and the tornado becomes massive and threatens Kate and her team.

FIVE YEARS LATER, Kate is working for NOAA in New York City when she suddenly gets a visit from Javi who wants Kate to come back to Oklahoma and work with his new company and his new portable radar to 3D model a tornado to learn more about them.  At first, Kate refuses and Javi returns to Oklahoma. However, Javi sends her a news story about a town being destroyed and Kate decides to return to Oklahoma and give him and his radar a week to work.

While Javi introduces the rest of his company’s team to Kate, we are introduced to Tyler Owens, a self-described tornado wrangler and YouTube personality who does things like live-stream shooting fireworks inside an active tornado… from the inside. Seeing that Javi has brought a new person aboard, Tyler tries to get inside her head to discover which tornado she’s going to chase.

There are several parallels between this film and the 1996 film. A traumatic event spurs our heroine into action, or in Kate’s case inaction. Tyler tries to get information from Kate in the same way Jonas Miller tried to get information from Jo about her husband’s instincts about chasing. The increasing peril each tornado brings is greater than the last one.

However, the screenwriter seems to have deliberately reversed the roles we might expect. In the original “Twister,” Jo’s team was the scrappy underdog, while Jonas’s team represented the well-funded establishment. In “Twisters,” it’s Javi’s team that appears polished and professional, while Tyler’s team embodies the daredevil spirit. Still, not everything is as it appears.

Curiously, the film introduces numerous amateur storm chasers who could have served as a cautionary tale, demonstrating the dangers of inexperience. However, this potential plot point remains largely unexplored.

One major disappointment for me was the score by Benjamin Wallfisch. It lacked the energy and excitement of Mark Mancina’s original score, which would have greatly enhanced the film’s intensity. I saw the film in IMAX, but the format felt unnecessary and didn’t add much to the experience. The sound design was underwhelming, and the direction of Lee Isaac Chung was somewhat reserved.

The tornadoes themselves, which were so vividly characterized in the original TWISTER, seemed somewhat formless and less menacing in this sequel. Even the fire tornado, caused by an entire refinery exploding, failed to impress.

Interestingly, the film hints at a potential sequel through a montage of future events, suggesting that Javi, Tyler, and Kate ultimately join forces. This technique sometimes called a flashforward or a post-credits scene without the credits, offers an intriguing glimpse into the characters’ future paths.

So, you may think with all my nitpicking, that I didn’t like TWISTERS. You’d be wrong.

A few weeks ago we introduced this corollary to my mantra:

EXPECTATIONS SUBVERT ENJOYMENT.

If you’ve been following along, you know that my anticipation for TWISTERS was sky-high; it was inevitable that TWISTERS would suffer in comparison to TWISTER.

If you’ve done no research, you’d never know that Daisy Edgar-Jones is an English actress as she totally nailed her American accent.

Glen Powell continues to amaze. He is one breakthrough performance from being a major star. He’s done a lot of work recently, in different genres, and he’s one to watch. I await the one major role where you say, “Nobody else could play this role.”

Anthony Ramos again put in Yeoman’s work as Javi and David Corenswet, James Gunn’s Superman, as Javi’s business partner, Scott does a nice counterpoint performance to his future role as a man who seems jealous of Javi’s intimacy with Kate.

Finally, Brandon Perea stands out as part of Tyler’s crew along with Katy O’Brian, Sasha Lane, and Tunde Adebimpe.

Frankly, Joseph Kosinski’s screen story and Mark L. Smith’s screenplay could have been stronger, but the actors’ performances overcame those weaknesses.

On the ten-point scale from trakt.tv that I use to rate content, I wavered between giving TWISTERS a six or a seven, but recognizing that my expectations of a movie I’ve loved for 28 years, I’m giving its spiritual sequel a seven out of ten. That’s equivalent to three and a half stars on a five-star scale.

As always:
WATCH CONTENT; FORM OPINION.
You’ve just heard mine; I’d like to hear yours.

Ciao for now!

Trailer

Mikeylito’s Matinée Review

DUNE: Part Two | Mikeylito’s Matinée

In preparation for my viewing of Denis Villenueve’s Dune: Part Two, the feature-length follow-up to the spectacular Dune: Part One from 2021., I spent the week watching all of Villeneuve’s English language films, including a couple I hadn’t seen before: one named Prisoners, and another titled Enemy. However, if you plan on viewing Dune: Part Two, I think it’s essential that you watch Dune: Part One. It’s currently streaming on the MAX streaming service as well as Digital VOD. In fact, VUDU, the digital retailer that is being renamed Fandango At Home, is already offering pre-orders for both films in a bundle for $34.99 US in 4K UHD.

Villeneuve picks up Dune: Part Two right after the end of Dune: Part One. There is the briefest exposition of what has occurred between the two films. Villeneuve quickly picks up the dramatic narrative as Paul Atreides and Lady Jessica continue their journey with the Fremen to their homeland trying to avoid the Harkonnens, who have continued to attack Arrakis, the planet taken from them by the Emperor and given to the Atreides. After apparently eliminating all of the Atreides, the Harkonnens continue to attack the Fremen because they want unfettered control of the planet’s Spice.

Paul is taken in by the Fremen after demonstrating his ability to fight. He is determined to learn the ways of the Fremen and seeks the counsel and instruction of the Fremen’s leader, Stilgar. Many of the Fremen do not trust Paul and Jessica, but Stilgar is convinced that Paul is the fulfillment of the sect’s prophecies and takes him under his wing. Meanwhile, Jessica, as a member of the Bene Gesserit, is informed that the local Reverend Mother is dying and the sect wants Lady Jessica to take her place.

Timothée Chalamet continues his excellent performance as Paul, who continues to have visions about his fate and those around him including the woman he falls in love with, Chani, skillfully played by Zendaya. Zendaya plays Chani as fiercely independent, at first suspicious of Paul’s ability to survive. Rebecca Ferguson returns as Lady Jessica, Paul’s mother who has trained Paul in the ways of the Bene Gesserit against the order’s wishes. Javier Bardem comes back as the Fremen leader Stilgar, and for a major portion of the film, I was impressed by the portrayal of Glossu Rabban Harkkonen by Dave Bautista. Bautista embodies the character’s arrogance and brutality, seemingly effortlessly.

Also appearing as an even more brutal Harkonnen is Elvis… er… Austin Butler, who gives another strong performance as the heir apparent to Baron Vladimir Harkonnen, expertly played by Stellan Skarsgard in a repeat performance from PART ONE.

Up until now, I have bestowed nothing but praise on the film.
I’ll be the first to admit that what follows is nitpicking.

• There are so many Bene Gesserit wandering around. It was difficult for me to tell one apart from the other with the very similar costumes.
• There’s a scene we saw in the trailer; so, I don’t mind discussing it.
It’s a huge setpiece of Paul learning to mount a sandworm and riding it.
As the film progresses, we see that riding sandworms is how the Fremen get around.
We learn how they get ON, but we never see them get OFF.
Also, the sandworms are like Amtrak. You’ll see what I mean.
• Paul has so many names.
First, he’s Paul.
Then, he’s Muad’Dib.
Then, he’s Usul.
And, he has even more names and they use them interchangeably and inconsistently.
I suppose there’s a story reason for it, but it’s problematic. At least for me.
• Finally, there are parts of the film that look like they were filmed on the set of Star Trek: Discovery. Huge setpieces that look like they were filmed on a soundstage with huge matte photographs or paintings forming the background. It made the scenes look flat, again to me.
In those sequences, it somewhat took me out of the film.

Still, the score by Hans Zimmer and the majority of the photography lensed by Greig Fraser was immersive and stunning. Their work and Denis Villeneuve’s direction along with the entire cast and crew made this a marvelous second chapter of a story of destiny, revenge, and environmentalism.

Dune: Part Two is rated PG-13 for sequences of strong violence, some suggestive material, and brief strong language.

Now, what did I think of the film?
I gave DUNE: PART TWO, not a 10 as I gave PART ONE, but close.
I gave DUNE: PART TWO a nine out of ten, equivalent to 4½ stars out of five.
You absolutely should see DUNE: PART TWO in theatres as soon as you can.

As I always say, WATCH CONTENT; FORM OPINION.
You just heard mine; I’d like to hear yours.

Sneak Preview Trailer

Tasked by Twitter

Occasionally, one is tasked by Twitter users to respond to some random question that is pulled from the nether world. This morning while I was working on a future project, I noticed the following task on the service: Name 4 MOVIES you have Watched MANY times.

Here are my choices with some explanation:

  1. Groundhog Day (1993)
    This film runs on a loop for 24 hours every February 2nd,
    I even have a YouTube playlist set up so I don’t have to monitor it.
    Groundhog Day 24-Hour Marathon
  2. Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)
    This is a consensus pick.
    Before a premiere of a Marvel Cinematic Universe production, I used to watch the entire MCU production slate from start to finish. I also used to watch in chronological order. So, this film was always first up. This habit has somewhat bit the dust since the end of The Infinity Saga, but I’d imagine I might still do this in the future.
    I have a YouTube playlist for this as well.
  3. tick… Tick… BOOM! (2021)
    I just love this film.
    Ever since it premiered, it brings me joy.
    It has just about everything: pathos, music, comedy, and drama.
    I love the cast, especially Andrew Garfield and Robin de Jesús.
    I wish I could come home to “Michael” and wrap him in my arms to make him feel secure.
    love… Love… LOVE! this movie.
  4. What’s Up Doc? (1972)
    This used to be the film that I began every New Year with.
    These days, it’s part of a double feature with When Harry Met Sally (1989).
    It’s hard to go to bed unhappy after watching this film.

Usually, when you have a list of any kind, you’ll have a pick that just missed the cut. People call that an Honorable Mention. Yet, my fifth pick stands above all the rest. When all the political silos and television faux pas are too much to bear, I sit down and watch what I call my Venerable Mention:

Network (1986)
In that year, this film depicted a future where anything goes on a network newscast. Well, reality has not only matched this fantastical story, but it has also surpassed it. You need only to tune into one, better two, cable news networks on a given night before you start to wonder what is real and what is surreal.

That’s it.
That’s my answer to the task.
What’s yours?

Ciao for now!
Mike